header-logo header-logo

01 July 2011 / Tom Duncan , Rani Mina
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Counting the costs

Do not fear the Jackson juggernaut, say Rani Mina & Tom Duncan

Professor Dominic Regan recently reported upon the implementation of the “Jackson juggernaut” in legal costs management. The proposals, made by Lord Justice Jackson in his Review of Civil Litigation, certainly have become a considerable force for change, however, should litigants and litigators have concerns about the cost management techniques being piloted?

The next step in the reform process is the extension of the costs management pilot scheme, currently running in the Birmingham mercantile court, to all technology and construction courts and mercantile courts, from 1 October 2011. It will take effect as a pilot in these courts and is likely to be rolled out to other courts in due course.

Practice Direction

The associated Practice Direction (PD51F) provides that:
 

  1. The parties are to exchange and submit their detailed budgets to the court prior to the first case management conference (CMC). This should follow a standard template, which is
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll