header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
03 July 2008 / Augur Pearce
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Coupledom

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Augur Pearce discusses the meaning of civil partnership

In dismissing the appeal in Burden v United Kingdom (7 May 2008, Appn 13378/05, discussed at 158 NLJ 681, [2008] All ER (D) 391 (Apr)), the Grand Chamber (GC) of the European Court of Human Rights held British inheritance tax rules did not improperly discriminate between the situations of civil partners and the two appellant sisters. The sisters' cohabitation was qualitatively different from those of civil partners.

But how? The GC held civil partnership (CP) distinguishable as a publicly recognised, legally effective relationship entailing both rights and obligations—language that could describe any contract. For all its importance to tax lawyers, Burden points up a serious family law issue: where, on a spectrum between marriage at one end and a practical or commercial arrangement at the other, does CP belong? Behind the answer lies another fast-developing field: the interaction of law and religion.

Organised Religion and Homosexuality

Organised religious groups frequently dislike same-sex relationships. Not all their members agree, and hierarchies do not necessarily speak for the rank and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll