header-logo header-logo

25 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Court concludes Lodhi hearing

A 10-year legal battle has ended with the High Court quashing the Home Office decision to extradite businessman Mohammed Lodhi

A 10-year legal battle has ended with the High Court quashing the Home Office decision to extradite businessman Mohammed Lodhi to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) where there was a risk he would have been tortured or suffered inhuman or degrading treatment.

The court also held Lodhi would have been prejudiced at his trial, or punished and detained by reason of his race and nationality. Sadly, the ruling, which concludes the longest running extradition proceedings in English legal history, comes too late for Lodhi, who died in January.
Lodhi had been accused of involvement in drugs manufacturing.

His lawyers argued the allegations were fabricated as a result of business rivalries, and that torture was widespread in the UAE’s prisons.The court accepted that the evidence painted a “picture of a state which respects human rights in a very selective way”.

Lodhi’s solicitor, Corker Binning solicitor Andrew Smith, says: “To win an extradition case on human rights grounds

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
FIFA’s 2026 Men's World Cup is already mired in controversy, with complaints over ‘excessive prices’ and opaque ticketing. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys warns that governing bodies may face scrutiny under EU competition law, with allegations of a ‘dominant—if not monopolistic—position’ in ticket sales
Ten years after Brexit, UK and EU trade mark regimes are drifting apart in practice if not principle. Writing in NLJ this week, Roger Lush and Lara Elder of Carpmaels & Ransford highlight tighter UK scrutiny after SkyKick, where overly broad filings may signal ‘bad faith’
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
back-to-top-scroll