header-logo header-logo

Court concludes Lodhi hearing

25 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A 10-year legal battle has ended with the High Court quashing the Home Office decision to extradite businessman Mohammed Lodhi

A 10-year legal battle has ended with the High Court quashing the Home Office decision to extradite businessman Mohammed Lodhi to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) where there was a risk he would have been tortured or suffered inhuman or degrading treatment.

The court also held Lodhi would have been prejudiced at his trial, or punished and detained by reason of his race and nationality. Sadly, the ruling, which concludes the longest running extradition proceedings in English legal history, comes too late for Lodhi, who died in January.
Lodhi had been accused of involvement in drugs manufacturing.

His lawyers argued the allegations were fabricated as a result of business rivalries, and that torture was widespread in the UAE’s prisons.The court accepted that the evidence painted a “picture of a state which respects human rights in a very selective way”.

Lodhi’s solicitor, Corker Binning solicitor Andrew Smith, says: “To win an extradition case on human rights grounds is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll