header-logo header-logo

11 June 2010
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Court of protection

DH NHS Foundation Trust v PS (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) [2010] EWHC 1217 (Fam), [2010] All ER (D) 275 (May)

Judgments of the Court of Protection should be given in open court, suitably anonymised to protect the parties. That was because (i) such judgments should be in the public domain; and (ii) to assist others who may be faced with a similar dilemma. Accordingly judgment in the instant case, concerning proceedings brought in the Court of Protection and instituted by an NHS Foundation Trust against a patient (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) designed to ensure that the patient underwent necessary surgery, was handed down in open court.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
The controversial Mazur ruling, which caused widespread uncertainty about the role of non-solicitors in litigation work, has been overturned on appeal
Two landmark social media cases in the US could influence social media regulation in the UK, lawyers predict
Barristers have urged the government to set up Nightingale-style specialist courts, with jury trials, to prioritise rape, sexual assault and domestic abuse trials
Victims of violent crimes who suffer life-changing injuries receive less than half the financial support today than those in the 1990s, according to a senior personal injury lawyer
Rising numbers of cases, an increase in litigants in person and an overall lack of investment is piling pressure on the family court, the Law Society has warned
back-to-top-scroll