header-logo header-logo

11 June 2010
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Court of protection

DH NHS Foundation Trust v PS (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) [2010] EWHC 1217 (Fam), [2010] All ER (D) 275 (May)

Judgments of the Court of Protection should be given in open court, suitably anonymised to protect the parties. That was because (i) such judgments should be in the public domain; and (ii) to assist others who may be faced with a similar dilemma. Accordingly judgment in the instant case, concerning proceedings brought in the Court of Protection and instituted by an NHS Foundation Trust against a patient (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) designed to ensure that the patient underwent necessary surgery, was handed down in open court.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
New planning fee rises, wider trade union access rights and a service-by-email trap feature in Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
back-to-top-scroll