header-logo header-logo

The court of public opinion

25 September 2018 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7810 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7810_backpage

Athelstane Aamodt is not bowled over by the binary choice of guilty or not guilty

  • Should English criminal courts have a third choice of verdict like the Scots, or even seven like the Italians?

The acquittal of the England and County Durham cricketer Ben Stokes last month of affray has raised some interesting questions about what an acquittal means in reality for a defendant. Stokes, despite being acquitted and therefore not guilty of anything criminal whatsoever, was nonetheless shown on footage taken from CCTV cameras in central Bristol on the evening in question punching Ryan Hale in the face before Hale fell to the ground, apparently unconscious. Hale’s friend Ryan Ali (a co-defendant in the trial and also acquitted) was left with a broken eye socket and heavy swelling to his face following the fight. Stokes’s acquittal for affray—the only offence with which he was charged—did not, it seems, secure him an acquittal in the court of public opinion on the basis of the responses from sports writers and commentators.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll