header-logo header-logo

Court reform under fire

01 March 2023
Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have highlighted their concerns about the £1.3bn court reform programme, following a devastating report by the National Audit Office (NAO).

The NAO report, ‘Progress on the courts and tribunals reform programme’, published last week, highlighted several failures in implementation, singling out the common platform, the digital case management for the criminal courts, which has been affected by repeated delays, as being ‘of most concern’. For example, in September 2022, the rollout was paused after HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) found the system failed to send more than 3,000 ‘important notifications’ to partner agencies between June 2021 and August 2022. As a result of this, in 35 cases an individual was not fitted with an electronic monitoring tag when they should have been.

The NAO said HMCTS’s focus on delivering reforms quickly has created extra burdens for the criminal courts when they were already under pressure. Despite this, the December 2023 deadline for completion is unlikely to be met.

Other problems included that many online divorce and probate cases needed manual interventions by court staff despite the relevant project being marked as complete.

In terms of value for money, the NAO found HMCTS now expects lifetime savings of £2bn from the reforms—£310m lower than estimates in 2019, when the NAO last reported, owing to revised assumptions, design changes and higher ongoing costs.

Nick Vineall KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘Many of the problems with the court reform programme identified in the NAO report echo the experiences we have heard from barristers on the ground.’

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Our concern, reflected in the NAO’s report, is that delays in the courts are being exacerbated by ineffective reforms, which are costing more time and wasting money.’ She called on HMCTS to provide an updated timetable for completion.

Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll