header-logo header-logo

01 March 2023
Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail

Court reform under fire

Lawyers have highlighted their concerns about the £1.3bn court reform programme, following a devastating report by the National Audit Office (NAO).

The NAO report, ‘Progress on the courts and tribunals reform programme’, published last week, highlighted several failures in implementation, singling out the common platform, the digital case management for the criminal courts, which has been affected by repeated delays, as being ‘of most concern’. For example, in September 2022, the rollout was paused after HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) found the system failed to send more than 3,000 ‘important notifications’ to partner agencies between June 2021 and August 2022. As a result of this, in 35 cases an individual was not fitted with an electronic monitoring tag when they should have been.

The NAO said HMCTS’s focus on delivering reforms quickly has created extra burdens for the criminal courts when they were already under pressure. Despite this, the December 2023 deadline for completion is unlikely to be met.

Other problems included that many online divorce and probate cases needed manual interventions by court staff despite the relevant project being marked as complete.

In terms of value for money, the NAO found HMCTS now expects lifetime savings of £2bn from the reforms—£310m lower than estimates in 2019, when the NAO last reported, owing to revised assumptions, design changes and higher ongoing costs.

Nick Vineall KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘Many of the problems with the court reform programme identified in the NAO report echo the experiences we have heard from barristers on the ground.’

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘Our concern, reflected in the NAO’s report, is that delays in the courts are being exacerbated by ineffective reforms, which are costing more time and wasting money.’ She called on HMCTS to provide an updated timetable for completion.

Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll