header-logo header-logo

24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Court reforms ushered in

Crown court cases are to be completed within 16 weeks in future, as part of a programme of reform initiated by court staff.

Eight proposals to speed up and simplify services will be put into practice in the courts. Lord Falconer, the Justice Secretary, has held discussions with court staff during the last six months to draw up the programme, known as Breakthrough.

The proposals include resolving child care cases within 40 weeks, and dealing with most guilty pleas in magistrates’ courts at the first hearing.
Breakthrough will also provide incentives to ensure the majority of civil business is initiated online, introduce a presumption that all but the most complex small claims in the county court are dealt with through mediation, and encourage more in-court conciliation and mediation for family issues.
Lord Falconer says: “Breakthrough in the courts is particularly important because the proposals for improvement have come directly from court staff themselves—bottom-up and not top-down reform.”

Many courts are already delivering on the pledges, according to the Ministry of Justice. Care cases are regularly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll