header-logo header-logo

Court rejects clarity call on assisted suicide

26 February 2009
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Legal services , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Public

Debbie Purdy’s legal bid to have the law on assisted suicide clarified has failed in the Court of Appeal. Purdy, who suffers from multiple sclerosis, wanted to know whether or not her husband would face prosecution if he helped her travel to for an assisted suicide. She had asked the court to rule that further guidance was necessary on the scope of the Suicide Act 1961, s 2(1) which makes aiding and abetting suicide a crime, but the appeal court upheld the earlier ruling that the Code of Practice for Crown Prosecutors, and existing safeguards in administrative law, satisfied human rights law and provided the necessary clarity.

However, as a footnote Lord Judge CJ added that the court was not powerless, despite the fact that the discretion of the director of public prosecutions in relation to the promulgation of public policy was “effectively absolute”. “If the prosecution amounts to an abuse of process, the court will dismiss it,” he said. “However even if a defendant were to be convicted, but the circumstances were such that in the judgment of the court, no penal sanction would be appropriate, the court, exercising its own sentencing responsibilities would order that the off ender should be discharged.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll