header-logo header-logo

Coventry v Lawrence provokes mixed feelings

30 July 2015
Issue: 7663 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The much-anticipated Supreme Court case of Coventry v Lawrence provokes “mixed feelings”, according to litigation lawyer David Greene.

The Supreme Court held 5-2 that the conditional fee regime does not breach human rights, at [2015] UKSC 50.

Writing in NLJ this week, Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe and NLJ consultant editor, says: “On the one hand, as a claimant lawyer I welcomed the finding but on the other hand I felt disappointed that after all this time and angst the court said ‘no change’ notwithstanding that it was the Supreme Court that seemed to start this hare running. The judgment is fascinating reading but the whole process has been somewhat of a damp squib.” Greene adds that the court “reminded us that the major issue for the court when examining legislation is not whether it is fair in its application...The test initially in challenging legislation is whether it was a disproportionate way to achieving a legitimate aim.”

Issue: 7663 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll