header-logo header-logo

06 May 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Human rights
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: contract tracing app raises concerns

A proposed contact tracing app for COVID-19 raises ‘significant concerns’ regarding privacy and human rights, a committee of MPs and Peers has concluded

The app would play a role in the government’s plan to relax lockdown measures. It would notify individuals who may have been exposed to the coronavirus to take appropriate action such as self-isolate or get tested.

In a report published this week, the Joint Committee on Human Rights said the app must not be released unless there are strong safeguards in place. It warned the app could fall foul of data protection law and human rights protections unless there were clear benefits and efficacy to make collecting this data justifiable. Primary legislation must be used to guarantee data and human rights protections.

The committee called for an independent body to provide oversight, for the Health Secretary to review the app’s efficacy and safety every 21 days, and for the government and health authorities to transparent at all times about how the app and the data collected is being used.

The committee also said it is highly concerned the app has not been subject to in-depth parliamentary scrutiny and called for this to take place.

Harriet Harman MP, chair of the committee, said: ‘Assurances from ministers about privacy are not enough.

‘The government has given assurances about protection of privacy so they should have no objection to those assurances being enshrined in law. The contact tracing app involves unprecedented data gathering. There must be robust legal protection for individuals about what that data will be used for, who will have access to it and how it will be safeguarded from hacking.

‘Parliament was able quickly to agree to give the government sweeping powers. It is perfectly possible for parliament to do the same for legislation to protect privacy.’

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll