header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Coronavirus Bill

19 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Public
printer mail-detail
The Emergency Coronavirus Bill, which will create sweeping powers for state authorities to protect public health, is likely to be introduced in Parliament early next week

Powers granted by the Bill, which MPs are not to be given a vote on, will last for two years. Proposals revealed this week include expanding the availability of video and audio link in court proceedings.

According to the Department of Health & Social Care, ‘this would include magistrates’ court hearings taking place by phone or by video, should an individual appeal restriction of movement due to quarantine measures.

‘This will ensure that an appeal takes place but will not require a person to break quarantine in order to attend in person. It will also enable the expansion of the availability of video and audio link in various criminal proceedings, including full video and audio hearings in certain circumstances, and public participation in relation to these and other court and tribunal proceedings conducted by audio and video.

‘The measures will enable a wider range of proceedings to be carried out by video, so that courts can continue to function and remain open to the public, without the need for participants to attend in person. This will give judges more options for avoiding adjournments and keeping business moving through the courts to help reduce delays in the administration of justice and alleviate the impact on families, victims, witnesses and defendants.’

Other proposals in the Bill include enabling regulators to emergency register suitable people as regulated healthcare professionals, including recently retired people and students nearing the end of their training, as well as social workers who may have recently left the profession.

The Bill also provides indemnity for clinical negligence liabilities arising from NHS activities carried out for the purposes of dealing with, or because of, the coronavirus outbreak, in order to legally protect health workers.

There will be changes to legislation dealing with doctors' opinions on detaining mental health patients and time limits, as well as to procedures in relation to death and still-birth certification.

Commenting in LexisPSL Public Law, Gerard Hanratty, partner at Browne Jacobson, said: ‘The proposals also address the reality of how serious this issue is by specifically addressing the need to manage the deceased with dignity and respect. Overall, the Bill contains a realistic set of proposals to support and enable our public services during this difficult time.’

The Bill might also contain protection for private sector renters during the crisis. The National Housing Federation has confirmed that housing associations will not evict tenants in the event they fall behind on rent due to coronavirus.

Olwen Brown, partner at Anthony Collins Solicitors, commenting in LexisPSL Public Law, said: ‘The government has said that local authorities will be fully compensated for coronavirus expenditure but it’s not necessarily easy to identify what that is, so time will tell on the reality of the policy.

‘The news about council tax relief for those hit by the virus has however got to be good news, especially given the economy that persists at the moment and the number of families likely to be affected as shops, restaurants and bars close. But of course, this is also a time when the demands on councils for social care support is going to be growing, and given the enormous hits to local authority budgets since 2010, unless central government does make good on its promise to pay, the impact on councils is going to be unbearable.’

The Bill may amend the Care Act 2014 to enable local authorities to prioritise the most urgent care needs. It is also likely to remove the rules on waiting days in relation to statutory sick pay, while employers with less than 250 employees should be able to reclaim statutory sick pay.

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll