header-logo header-logo

30 March 2020
Issue: 7881 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Impact on protected groups

MPs are investigating whether COVID-19 and the government’s response to it are having a disproportionate impact on groups with protected characteristics

The Women and Equalities Committee launched an inquiry this week into whether all relevant equality issues have been considered, any possible unforeseen consequences and what improvements can be made.

Concerns that have emerged so far include the increased risk of domestic abuse where households are required to stay at home, the impact of school closures on children with special educational needs and their families, and the risk that redeploying healthcare and social work professionals to deal with the pandemic will leave older and disabled people vulnerable in other ways.

The Committee’s chair, Caroline Nokes MP, said the government needed ‘to ensure that its policies and plans are as effective as possible’.

The Committee would like to receive responses by 30 April, or as soon as possible if relevant to the government’s three-week review of current measures. Find out more at https://bit.ly/2WYMr96.

Issue: 7881 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll