header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Insurers & claimants co-operating on standards

Claimant and defendant personal injury lawyers have collaborated to produce a set standard of practice for cases during the COVID-19 crisis

The agreement, which emphasises the importance of efficient communications between the two, usually opposing, sides, is the joint initiative of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) and the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL). It sets out measures to accept service and evidence by email, and agreeing to use a form of video conferencing for medical examinations when appropriate.

Medco, the system for sourcing medical reports for soft tissue injury claims, has agreed the current ban on the use of remote examinations will be lifted, but with conditions. Both parties will face challenges complying with existing court directions and timetables, but there is now case law to support extensions of up to 56 days with consent.

Both Apil and FOIL recommend that practitioners are minded to consent to requests for extensions. They also ask that, where possible, parties exchange their costs budgets.

‘These are unprecedented times and both APIL and FOIL want to ensure that cases run smoothly across the UK so far as possible,’ said Gordon Dalyell, APIL president.

‘Our members told us their concerns about remote working and how they might adapt to the new way in which the courts are operating. Defendants are also going to have their own difficulties. Both organisations feel it is important to do what they can to help to resolve these issues together.’

Anthony Baker, FOIL president said: ‘During such difficult times it is testament to the collaborative nature of both sides of the industry that FOIL and APIL can work closely together to agree a best practice guidance document. 

‘Following this joint guidance where possible will be of benefit to all and hopefully ensure that we can navigate these choppy waters with understanding and cooperation at the forefront of what we do.’  

The guidance can be found on the FOIL website at www.foil.org.uk. It is on the APIL website at: www.apil.org.uk

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll