header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Insurers & claimants co-operating on standards

Claimant and defendant personal injury lawyers have collaborated to produce a set standard of practice for cases during the COVID-19 crisis

The agreement, which emphasises the importance of efficient communications between the two, usually opposing, sides, is the joint initiative of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) and the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL). It sets out measures to accept service and evidence by email, and agreeing to use a form of video conferencing for medical examinations when appropriate.

Medco, the system for sourcing medical reports for soft tissue injury claims, has agreed the current ban on the use of remote examinations will be lifted, but with conditions. Both parties will face challenges complying with existing court directions and timetables, but there is now case law to support extensions of up to 56 days with consent.

Both Apil and FOIL recommend that practitioners are minded to consent to requests for extensions. They also ask that, where possible, parties exchange their costs budgets.

‘These are unprecedented times and both APIL and FOIL want to ensure that cases run smoothly across the UK so far as possible,’ said Gordon Dalyell, APIL president.

‘Our members told us their concerns about remote working and how they might adapt to the new way in which the courts are operating. Defendants are also going to have their own difficulties. Both organisations feel it is important to do what they can to help to resolve these issues together.’

Anthony Baker, FOIL president said: ‘During such difficult times it is testament to the collaborative nature of both sides of the industry that FOIL and APIL can work closely together to agree a best practice guidance document. 

‘Following this joint guidance where possible will be of benefit to all and hopefully ensure that we can navigate these choppy waters with understanding and cooperation at the forefront of what we do.’  

The guidance can be found on the FOIL website at www.foil.org.uk. It is on the APIL website at: www.apil.org.uk

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll