header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
25 June 2020 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Human rights
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Lockdown lovers

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
23164
Lockdown laws from a loving perspective, by Peter Thompson QC

COVID-19 has brought death and despair. We cannot see an end but we have been offered hope in the form of restrictions on our activities which ought, if the scientists are right, to improve our chances of survival. Yes, but what are the restrictions and what do they mean for you and me?

Lockdown law

First, the black letter law. Although the Secretary of State has been empowered by the Coronavirus Act 2020 to issue directions relating to events, gatherings and premises (s 52 and Sch 22), the main restrictions on our activities have been imposed, as of 26 March 2020, by regulations made under the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984. The controlling instrument for England is the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020, (SI 2020/350) and a similar instrument regulates activities in Wales. Both have been amended several times and for England the most significant amendments are in the Amendment No 3 regulations (SI 2020/558), which came

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll