header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
25 June 2020 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Human rights
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Lockdown lovers

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
23164
Lockdown laws from a loving perspective, by Peter Thompson QC

COVID-19 has brought death and despair. We cannot see an end but we have been offered hope in the form of restrictions on our activities which ought, if the scientists are right, to improve our chances of survival. Yes, but what are the restrictions and what do they mean for you and me?

Lockdown law

First, the black letter law. Although the Secretary of State has been empowered by the Coronavirus Act 2020 to issue directions relating to events, gatherings and premises (s 52 and Sch 22), the main restrictions on our activities have been imposed, as of 26 March 2020, by regulations made under the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984. The controlling instrument for England is the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020, (SI 2020/350) and a similar instrument regulates activities in Wales. Both have been amended several times and for England the most significant amendments are in the Amendment No 3 regulations (SI 2020/558), which came

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll