header-logo header-logo

15 July 2020 / Ken Young
Issue: 7895 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

COVID-19 & the impact on catastrophic personal injury claims

24295
Remote working should be embraced as a catalyst for change & the breaking of (bad) habits, says Ken Young

COVID-19 has clearly heavily impacted all aspects of society and claims for damages arising from catastrophic personal injuries have not been exempt. However, has it—in certain ways—provided an opportunity to pause, put our foot on the ball and look at the claims process and how that could be improved? What are the practical outcomes for future claims costs, handling and behaviours in this area?

Naturally the pandemic has affected the progress of claims, with courts closing, evidence gathering stalling (or impossible), and rehabilitation curtailed.

Generally speaking, that would result in longer claims cycles and increases in damages and costs. However, is that the inevitable outcome or are we already seeing signs of progress, new thinking and innovation to adapt to the changing environment? While still early days, there are some interesting themes developing.

The most serious cases generally require early, intensive, and hands-on rehabilitation. In many cases

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll