header-logo header-logo

COVID-19 & the impact on catastrophic personal injury claims

15 July 2020 / Ken Young
Issue: 7895 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
24295
Remote working should be embraced as a catalyst for change & the breaking of (bad) habits, says Ken Young

COVID-19 has clearly heavily impacted all aspects of society and claims for damages arising from catastrophic personal injuries have not been exempt. However, has it—in certain ways—provided an opportunity to pause, put our foot on the ball and look at the claims process and how that could be improved? What are the practical outcomes for future claims costs, handling and behaviours in this area?

Naturally the pandemic has affected the progress of claims, with courts closing, evidence gathering stalling (or impossible), and rehabilitation curtailed.

Generally speaking, that would result in longer claims cycles and increases in damages and costs. However, is that the inevitable outcome or are we already seeing signs of progress, new thinking and innovation to adapt to the changing environment? While still early days, there are some interesting themes developing.

The most serious cases generally require early, intensive, and hands-on rehabilitation. In many cases

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll