header-logo header-logo

COVID hours not working, says Law Society

16 December 2020
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail
COVID operating hours are ‘potentially discriminatory’ and ‘unlikely to have a significant impact’ on the backlog of cases in the criminal courts, the Law Society has warned

The extended operating hours have been piloted at seven Crown Court centres as part of HM Courts and Tribunals (HMCTS) plans to tackle the criminal cases backlog, which now stands at more than 53,000 in the Crown Courts and 479,000 in the magistrates’ courts. Trials are currently being listed for 2022.

HMCTS has consulted on whether to extend the extra hours model to a further 65 courts from January.

However, David Greene, president of the Law Society, said: ‘After years of underfunding and cuts, there was already a significant backlog in the criminal courts which has been exacerbated by the pandemic.

‘Although more cases have been disposed of during COVID operating hours, it appears to have been largely due to the fact that shorter, less complex cases are allocated for these times, which means that a greater number of cases can be allocated, and therefore a greater number of those cases crack. It's our view that the vast majority of the benefits observed in the pilots would equally have been delivered had the same mix of cases been allocated to courts operating normal court hours.

‘Given the additional costs of running COVID operating hours courts we do not believe these proposals deliver value for money for the taxpayer or will achieve the objective of clearing the backlog. We are also concerned about the potential for discrimination to members with caring responsibilities.’

Greene suggested the extra resources used to run COVID operating hours be diverted into opening more Nightingale courts to increase court capacity.

The Bar Council is also strongly opposed to COVID operating hours.

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll