header-logo header-logo

23 July 2021 / Fred Philpott
Issue: 7942 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Covid law v Covid myth

53323
The law on self-isolation should be clear, but is it? Fred Philpott investigates

The message is: ‘You need to self-isolate’. This is the notification you get if you have used the NHS Covid-19 smartphone app and someone else who has checked in at the same venue within a certain time span has tested positive for Covid. The word ‘need’ is interesting. It can be used and taken to mean a benign suggestion such as ‘you need a drink’ or ‘you need to get some rest’. Alternatively, it can have a mandatory connotation which is clearly the way it is intended in respect of Covid.

The new regime

Nearly all legal restrictions relating to Covid were due to have ended on 19 July 2021. However, the strongest possible ‘advice’ is now in force from the government. It may be the ‘right’ thing to do is to follow the advice as regards, for example, wearing a mask on a crowded train.

This change in regime gives an opportunity to begin

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll