header-logo header-logo

CPD: time to sharpen up

27 January 2017 / Julie Brannan
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7731_brannan

Julie Brannan explains the SRA’s new approach to continuing competence

From 1 November 2016, we introduced a new regime for making sure solicitors in England and Wales keep their skills sharp and their knowledge up to date.

The old, “attend 16 hours of training” model is out. Now, all solicitors have to think about is:

  • whether their work is good enough;
  • identifying any areas where they could do better; and
  • addressing any weaknesses so they continue to deliver a proper standard of service.

We introduced this new approach to training and education to make sure that people get the best standard of service from solicitors. That standard is laid out in the Solicitors’ Competence Statement, which was published in April 2015. It sets out the skills we expect from those within the profession—not just for admission, but throughout their career.

The best way for solicitors to remain competent is by focusing learning and development on what really matters, rather than meeting our requirement to complete an arbitrary number of hours training.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll