header-logo header-logo

Crime Bill threatens justice

24 January 2008
Issue: 7305 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Legal services , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Crime Bill

Sections of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill are “unnec­essary and undesirable” and would “undermine the operation of the courts”, the Bar Council and the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) claim.

The Bill seeks to amend the test applied by the Court of Appeal when considering an appeal against conviction, including cases where there has been an abuse of the investigative or pros­ecution process. It also proposes extending the powers of non-legally qualified case workers to conduct trials for serious offences in magistrates’ courts. 

Sally O’Neill QC, chairman of the CBA, says: “Cases involving contested facts, issues of law, and serious allegations with imprison­ment as a possibility, should be conducted by properly qualified advocates who are subject to independent regulation otherwise there will be an increased risk of miscarriages of justice.”

Bar chairman, Tim Dutton QC, says cl 42 of the Bill attempts to amend the test applied by the Court of Appeal when considering an appeal against conviction.

“It is in part unnecessary and undesirable because it will alter the role of the Court of Appeal from a court of review to a tribu­nal of fact. It does not recognise the way in which the rules of crim­inal appeals currently operate. It will increase cost and delay,” he says.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll