header-logo header-logo

10 March 2023 / David Walbank KC
Issue: 8016 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal , Public
printer mail-detail

Crime brief: 10 March 2023

113988
David Walbank KC reports on the increasingly thorny issue of criminal damage inflicted through public protest
  • Criminal damage during public protest.
  • Proportionality under the European Convention on Human Rights.
  • Withdrawing the issue from the jury.

The policing of public protest grows increasingly complex. A seemingly endless list of causes about which their adherents demand that the world signals its agreement, combined with the increasing impact of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in criminal cases—particularly the principle of proportionality—has resulted in a glut of decisions in which the appellate courts have had to grapple with the competing interests of protestors and of the public at large.

Recent cases have related to the blocking of a highway leading to an international arms fair, the occupation of land earmarked for the HS2 high-speed rail link, a rally in Central London against the actions of the state of Israel, Extinction Rebellion’s demands for global action against climate change, an airport protest highlighting the polluting effects of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll