header-logo header-logo

Crime brief

02 August 2007
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

REDUCED DISCOUNT FOR THOSE “BANGED TO RIGHTS” >>
TERRORISM AND THE SOLICITORS DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY >>
GOODYEAR DIRECTIONS FOR DANGEROUS OFFENDERS >>

DISCOUNT FOR GUILTY PLEA

The Sentencing Guidelines Council has revised its guideline on reductions in sentence for guilty plea. The main changes, which apply to cases sentenced on or after 23 July 2007, are:
(i) Emphasising that discount for plea is not linked to severity of the crime, but as a measure to ensure the effective administration of justice.
(ii) Where the fact of a guilty plea has resulted in a non-custodial sentence, no further reduction need be made.
(iii) Discounts do not apply to ancillary orders such as disqualification from driving.
(iv) A change in terminology reflecting the fact that reduction levels are recommendations, not maximums.
(v) Where the evidence against the defendant is “overwhelming” only a 20% discount need be given reduced from one third. This major change reflects political and public disquiet following a number of recent cases.
(vi) Confirmation that in relation to indictable only offences the first reasonable opportunity to indicate guilt may be at the police station.

COURT DRESS

For

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll