header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Crime brief

REDUCED DISCOUNT FOR THOSE “BANGED TO RIGHTS” >>
TERRORISM AND THE SOLICITORS DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY >>
GOODYEAR DIRECTIONS FOR DANGEROUS OFFENDERS >>

DISCOUNT FOR GUILTY PLEA

The Sentencing Guidelines Council has revised its guideline on reductions in sentence for guilty plea. The main changes, which apply to cases sentenced on or after 23 July 2007, are:
(i) Emphasising that discount for plea is not linked to severity of the crime, but as a measure to ensure the effective administration of justice.
(ii) Where the fact of a guilty plea has resulted in a non-custodial sentence, no further reduction need be made.
(iii) Discounts do not apply to ancillary orders such as disqualification from driving.
(iv) A change in terminology reflecting the fact that reduction levels are recommendations, not maximums.
(v) Where the evidence against the defendant is “overwhelming” only a 20% discount need be given reduced from one third. This major change reflects political and public disquiet following a number of recent cases.
(vi) Confirmation that in relation to indictable only offences the first reasonable opportunity to indicate guilt may be at the police station.

COURT

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll