header-logo header-logo

Crime brief

02 August 2007
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

REDUCED DISCOUNT FOR THOSE “BANGED TO RIGHTS” >>
TERRORISM AND THE SOLICITORS DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY >>
GOODYEAR DIRECTIONS FOR DANGEROUS OFFENDERS >>

DISCOUNT FOR GUILTY PLEA

The Sentencing Guidelines Council has revised its guideline on reductions in sentence for guilty plea. The main changes, which apply to cases sentenced on or after 23 July 2007, are:
(i) Emphasising that discount for plea is not linked to severity of the crime, but as a measure to ensure the effective administration of justice.
(ii) Where the fact of a guilty plea has resulted in a non-custodial sentence, no further reduction need be made.
(iii) Discounts do not apply to ancillary orders such as disqualification from driving.
(iv) A change in terminology reflecting the fact that reduction levels are recommendations, not maximums.
(v) Where the evidence against the defendant is “overwhelming” only a 20% discount need be given reduced from one third. This major change reflects political and public disquiet following a number of recent cases.
(vi) Confirmation that in relation to indictable only offences the first reasonable opportunity to indicate guilt may be at the police station.

COURT DRESS

For

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll