header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
02 August 2007
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Crime brief

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

REDUCED DISCOUNT FOR THOSE “BANGED TO RIGHTS” >>
TERRORISM AND THE SOLICITORS DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY >>
GOODYEAR DIRECTIONS FOR DANGEROUS OFFENDERS >>

DISCOUNT FOR GUILTY PLEA

The Sentencing Guidelines Council has revised its guideline on reductions in sentence for guilty plea. The main changes, which apply to cases sentenced on or after 23 July 2007, are:
(i) Emphasising that discount for plea is not linked to severity of the crime, but as a measure to ensure the effective administration of justice.
(ii) Where the fact of a guilty plea has resulted in a non-custodial sentence, no further reduction need be made.
(iii) Discounts do not apply to ancillary orders such as disqualification from driving.
(iv) A change in terminology reflecting the fact that reduction levels are recommendations, not maximums.
(v) Where the evidence against the defendant is “overwhelming” only a 20% discount need be given reduced from one third. This major change reflects political and public disquiet following a number of recent cases.
(vi) Confirmation that in relation to indictable only offences the first reasonable opportunity to indicate guilt may be at the police station.

COURT

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll