header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008 / Andrew Keogh
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Features , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Crime brief

THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND IMMIGRATION ACT 2008

The Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 received Royal Assent on 8 May 2008. A number of provisions will come into force over the next two months, with many more changes anticipated during the next 12 months. This month’s Crime Brief details the main changes expected to take place in June and July 2008.

S 10: clarification of threshold for imposing a community sentence

Amends s 148 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003) to make clear that just because a community sentence may be passed in relation to an offence; or particular restrictions on liberty may be imposed by a community order or youth rehabilitation order, it does not require a court to pass such a sentence or to impose those restrictions.

S 11: restriction on imposing community sentences

The power to impose community penalties will be restricted to imprisonable offences, or offenders aged over 16 years who have on three or more occasions been sentenced to only a fine.

S 12: pre-sentence reports

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll