header-logo header-logo

08 July 2022
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Crime does not pay

Criminal courts have ground to a halt for the second week running as criminal barristers continued their strike

Barristers in wigs and gowns brandishing placards with slogans, ‘Crime does not pay’ and ‘Legal aid needs first aid’, made for a distinctive picket line outside the Old Bailey and other Crown Courts. The walkouts, which will increase by one day each week then switch to every other week, have attracted national media attention and high levels of support from outside the profession.

Solicitors are also considering striking―the London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) was due to close its ballot this week on whether to refuse to cover duty slots at police stations and magistrate’s courts. Many solicitors are already refusing to take on burglary and other low-paid work. LCCSA president Hesham Puri said action could begin as early as next week.

Last week, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) confirmed legislation will be laid in Parliament by 21 July to increase fees paid under the Advocates' Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS) by 15% from 30 September 2022. It also set out plans to respond to Sir Christopher Bellamy’s criminal legal aid review―which urged an immediate 15% rise in fees as a minimum―in full in the autumn, including ‘details on the longer-term funding and structural graduated fee schemes reform’, which may result in further increases. Criminal law solicitors will receive an extra 9% in fees from September.

However, Jo Sidhu QC, chair, and other executive members of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA), said: ‘Nothing has changed.

‘The Criminal Bar has known the government’s position for months, and resoundingly rejected it when 81% of us voted for days of action. That 15% will only apply to new representation orders from October 2022.

‘Therefore, criminal barristers would not expect to receive the benefit of the 15% increase until late 2023/24 because it would not apply to the 58,000 cases in the backlog.’

The CBA is calling for a 25% increase. It disputes the MoJ’s claim that legal and technical reasons prevent any increase attaching to current cases in the backlog, and has received advice from two QCs that it is lawful to backdate any increase to current representation orders.
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll