header-logo header-logo

Crime does not pay

08 July 2022
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Criminal courts have ground to a halt for the second week running as criminal barristers continued their strike

Barristers in wigs and gowns brandishing placards with slogans, ‘Crime does not pay’ and ‘Legal aid needs first aid’, made for a distinctive picket line outside the Old Bailey and other Crown Courts. The walkouts, which will increase by one day each week then switch to every other week, have attracted national media attention and high levels of support from outside the profession.

Solicitors are also considering striking―the London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) was due to close its ballot this week on whether to refuse to cover duty slots at police stations and magistrate’s courts. Many solicitors are already refusing to take on burglary and other low-paid work. LCCSA president Hesham Puri said action could begin as early as next week.

Last week, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) confirmed legislation will be laid in Parliament by 21 July to increase fees paid under the Advocates' Graduated Fee Scheme (AGFS) by 15% from 30 September 2022. It also set out plans to respond to Sir Christopher Bellamy’s criminal legal aid review―which urged an immediate 15% rise in fees as a minimum―in full in the autumn, including ‘details on the longer-term funding and structural graduated fee schemes reform’, which may result in further increases. Criminal law solicitors will receive an extra 9% in fees from September.

However, Jo Sidhu QC, chair, and other executive members of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA), said: ‘Nothing has changed.

‘The Criminal Bar has known the government’s position for months, and resoundingly rejected it when 81% of us voted for days of action. That 15% will only apply to new representation orders from October 2022.

‘Therefore, criminal barristers would not expect to receive the benefit of the 15% increase until late 2023/24 because it would not apply to the 58,000 cases in the backlog.’

The CBA is calling for a 25% increase. It disputes the MoJ’s claim that legal and technical reasons prevent any increase attaching to current cases in the backlog, and has received advice from two QCs that it is lawful to backdate any increase to current representation orders.
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Legal director appointment bolsters public and regulatory team

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Firm appoints training partner and four new trainees

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Firm strengthens military claims team with senior associate hire

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll