header-logo header-logo

The Criminal Bar: diminishing returns?

29 March 2018 / Richard Hoyle
Issue: 7787 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7787_backpage

Without an injection of faith & finance from the government, Richard Hoyle predicts a bleak future for the young Criminal Bar

The Bar at its best offers the chance to work in an endlessly stimulating environment, made up of increasingly diverse and socially mobile individuals. It still has much to do in these fields, and in others, but progress is being made, and the Young Barristers’ Committee (YBC), which I chair, is an active part of that.

To greater or lesser degrees, barristers operate flexibly, and properly considered, are extremely cost efficient from a client perspective, whether that client is the state or a private party. In percentage terms, the overheads in the form of chambers contributions and rent are generally low, and the vast majority of the barrister’s time is spent on income generation, or career development work, rather than on tasks to which barristers are less well suited. Young barristers are increasingly entrepreneurial, seeking new ways in which to market themselves and to tailor their expertise for different audiences. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll