header-logo header-logo

The Criminal Bar: diminishing returns?

29 March 2018 / Richard Hoyle
Issue: 7787 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7787_backpage

Without an injection of faith & finance from the government, Richard Hoyle predicts a bleak future for the young Criminal Bar

The Bar at its best offers the chance to work in an endlessly stimulating environment, made up of increasingly diverse and socially mobile individuals. It still has much to do in these fields, and in others, but progress is being made, and the Young Barristers’ Committee (YBC), which I chair, is an active part of that.

To greater or lesser degrees, barristers operate flexibly, and properly considered, are extremely cost efficient from a client perspective, whether that client is the state or a private party. In percentage terms, the overheads in the form of chambers contributions and rent are generally low, and the vast majority of the barrister’s time is spent on income generation, or career development work, rather than on tasks to which barristers are less well suited. Young barristers are increasingly entrepreneurial, seeking new ways in which to market themselves and to tailor their expertise for different audiences. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll