header-logo header-logo

Criminal barristers slam continued government delays

17 October 2018
Issue: 7813 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

A ‘Hatton Garden’ type burglary now pays less than a shoplifting case and ‘resumption of action’ is ‘inevitable’, criminal defence barristers have warned this week.

Heads of chambers are due to meet at the end of October to discuss what action to take if the Ministry of Justice does not honour its £15m offer in full and compensate for delays in implementing the offer.

In May, the Ministry of Justice offered criminal barristers an extra £15m for publicly funded defence work in the Crown Court in return for the Bar suspending its boycott of reforms to the Advocates’ Graduated Fee Scheme.

The deal was struck to prevent criminal barristers from engaging in an additional ‘no returns’ protest, under which barristers would refuse to cover for each other on cases where there was a timetable clash.

A 51.5% majority of more than 3,000 criminal barristers voted to accept the MoJ offer. However, Criminal Bar Association chair Chris Henley QC says the current form of the scheme, when applied to 2017–18 figures, would fall £4m short of the promise.

He has also voiced concerns about delays to the fourweek Ministry of Justice consultation on the spending increase, which ended last week but had been due to begin in July.

In his weekly message to members, Henley said a criminal case with thousands of pages is paid ‘as if it has less than 200’ while unused material is unremunerated even if disclosed. Fees for ‘guilty pleas and cracks are far below what they should be’ and ‘“shaken baby” cases with multiple experts are paid as if a minor punch up’.

Henley also called for ‘significant investment’ in prosecution fees.

Issue: 7813 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll