header-logo header-logo

17 October 2018
Issue: 7813 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Criminal barristers slam continued government delays

A ‘Hatton Garden’ type burglary now pays less than a shoplifting case and ‘resumption of action’ is ‘inevitable’, criminal defence barristers have warned this week.

Heads of chambers are due to meet at the end of October to discuss what action to take if the Ministry of Justice does not honour its £15m offer in full and compensate for delays in implementing the offer.

In May, the Ministry of Justice offered criminal barristers an extra £15m for publicly funded defence work in the Crown Court in return for the Bar suspending its boycott of reforms to the Advocates’ Graduated Fee Scheme.

The deal was struck to prevent criminal barristers from engaging in an additional ‘no returns’ protest, under which barristers would refuse to cover for each other on cases where there was a timetable clash.

A 51.5% majority of more than 3,000 criminal barristers voted to accept the MoJ offer. However, Criminal Bar Association chair Chris Henley QC says the current form of the scheme, when applied to 2017–18 figures, would fall £4m short of the promise.

He has also voiced concerns about delays to the fourweek Ministry of Justice consultation on the spending increase, which ended last week but had been due to begin in July.

In his weekly message to members, Henley said a criminal case with thousands of pages is paid ‘as if it has less than 200’ while unused material is unremunerated even if disclosed. Fees for ‘guilty pleas and cracks are far below what they should be’ and ‘“shaken baby” cases with multiple experts are paid as if a minor punch up’.

Henley also called for ‘significant investment’ in prosecution fees.

Issue: 7813 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll