header-logo header-logo

01 February 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Criminal Litigation

R (DPP) v North and East Hertfordshire Justices [2008] All ER (D) 57 (Jan)

A prosecution witness was not able to attend court because adverse weather conditions had forced the closure of a school and that witness could not arrange childcare at such short notice.

HELD The issue on an application for an adjournment is the question of doing justice to all those involved in the case. A prosecution should not be shut out as punishment for fault on the part of the Crown Prosecution Service, let alone on the part of a witness.

If, through no fault of a defendant, witnesses do not attend who should have attended, magistrates ought generally to grant adjournments.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Sharpe Pritchard—Victoria Heald-Barraclough

Magic Circle hire strengthens Sharpe Pritchard’s infrastructure finance capability

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin—Iskander Fernandez

Lewis Silkin adds corporate crime specialist to growing dispute resolution team

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr & Co—Michael Charalambous

Morr Co strengthens private client team with partner appointment

NEWS
Should every solicitor found to have acted dishonestly face automatic striking off? The answer, argues John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke LLP in NLJ this week, is no 
Winning an arbitral award against a state is one thing; enforcing it is another
Can government success in court tell us whether the rule of law is healthy? 
Poorly drafted dispute resolution clauses can trigger litigation before the real dispute is even addressed
As cryptocurrency becomes mainstream, family lawyers are increasingly confronting the challenges it creates on divorce
back-to-top-scroll