header-logo header-logo

Criticisms falling on deaf ears?

16 June 2011
Issue: 7470 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Legal Services Board claims lawyers fail clients on complaints-handling

Clients who are dissatisfied with their lawyer routinely find it difficult to bring a complaint, are not told that they can complain, or are charged by their lawyer for the privilege, according to research by the Legal Services Board (LSB).

More than half of 1,275 dissatisfied clients taking part had not been told about their service provider’s complaints procedure. Of those who were told, less than half found the procedure easy to understand.

The research, conducted by YouGov in February and March 2011, showed a strong link between knowledge of procedure and likelihood of making a complaint.

Only a third of dissatisfied clients made a complaint, of whom more than three quarters had been told about the complaints procedure. Of the two-thirds who didn’t make a complaint, only 18% had been told about the complaints procedure.

Where clients did raise a complaint, the vast majority (70%) progressed no further than the initial in-house stage of complaints-handling.

All approved regulators are required to ensure legal services providers clearly inform clients of their right to complain and the process for doing so, including giving them information about the legal ombudsman.

Chris Kenny, chief executive of the LSB, said: “Too many consumers give up when they are unhappy with the outcomes of the in-house process—despite having the right to escalate the complaint to the legal ombudsman.

“Improving this situation is an urgent priority for consumer protection, for improving the service itself and for enhancing public confidence in lawyers.

“A particular concern is the number of clients who reported that they have been charged for their complaints. The LSB regards this as totally unacceptable, and expects approved regulators to take firm action in all cases where it is proven.”

Jon Robins, director of Jures, an independent research company and thinktank dedicated to the legal services market, says the research shows that complaints handling remains a major problem for lawyers: “It is a problem that is only going to become more exposed with the scrutiny brought by new competition from the high street brands moving into the services as a result of the Legal Services Act. They know not only how to keep customers happy but also to bring unhappy ones back onside.”

Issue: 7470 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to head international insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll