header-logo header-logo

16 June 2011
Issue: 7470 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Criticisms falling on deaf ears?

Legal Services Board claims lawyers fail clients on complaints-handling

Clients who are dissatisfied with their lawyer routinely find it difficult to bring a complaint, are not told that they can complain, or are charged by their lawyer for the privilege, according to research by the Legal Services Board (LSB).

More than half of 1,275 dissatisfied clients taking part had not been told about their service provider’s complaints procedure. Of those who were told, less than half found the procedure easy to understand.

The research, conducted by YouGov in February and March 2011, showed a strong link between knowledge of procedure and likelihood of making a complaint.

Only a third of dissatisfied clients made a complaint, of whom more than three quarters had been told about the complaints procedure. Of the two-thirds who didn’t make a complaint, only 18% had been told about the complaints procedure.

Where clients did raise a complaint, the vast majority (70%) progressed no further than the initial in-house stage of complaints-handling.

All approved regulators are required to ensure legal services providers clearly inform clients of their right to complain and the process for doing so, including giving them information about the legal ombudsman.

Chris Kenny, chief executive of the LSB, said: “Too many consumers give up when they are unhappy with the outcomes of the in-house process—despite having the right to escalate the complaint to the legal ombudsman.

“Improving this situation is an urgent priority for consumer protection, for improving the service itself and for enhancing public confidence in lawyers.

“A particular concern is the number of clients who reported that they have been charged for their complaints. The LSB regards this as totally unacceptable, and expects approved regulators to take firm action in all cases where it is proven.”

Jon Robins, director of Jures, an independent research company and thinktank dedicated to the legal services market, says the research shows that complaints handling remains a major problem for lawyers: “It is a problem that is only going to become more exposed with the scrutiny brought by new competition from the high street brands moving into the services as a result of the Legal Services Act. They know not only how to keep customers happy but also to bring unhappy ones back onside.”

Issue: 7470 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll