header-logo header-logo

Cross-examining the experts

25 October 2007 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , CPR
printer mail-detail

Chris Pamplin analyses the results of a major survey
of the expert witness marketplace

As the largest multi-disciplinary expert witness community in the UK, the experienced individuals listed in the UK Register of Expert Witnesses represent an unrivalled source of information on matters of importance to experts and those who instruct them. Since 1995, the register has regularly conducted surveys of its expert witnesses and what follows is based on the latest of these surveys, carried out in the summer of 2007.

The experts

Of the 414 experts who returned questionnaires by mid-August, 181 were medical practitioners. Of the remaining 233 experts, 52 were engineers, 21 were in professions ancillary to medicine, 21 were accountants or bankers, 19 had scientific, veterinary or agricultural qualifications, 18 were surveyors or valuers and 17 were architects or building experts. The substantial “others” category totalled 85, of whom 12 were psychologists.

Work status and workload

Of the respondents, 211 (51% of the total) work full time and 165 (40%) work part time. Only 7% describe themselves as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll