header-logo header-logo

Crossing the line

20 November 2014 / Chris Syder
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Could UK strike laws be in breach of international obligations, asks Chris Syder

Membership of the International Labour Organisation (ILO), a Geneva-based United Nations body that promotes social justice, obliges the UK to respect freedom of association. Respect for freedom of association is also a legal obligation for those governments that ratify ILO labour standards incorporating freedom of association. The best known ILO labour standard concerning freedom of association is Convention 87. The UK ratified Convention 87 in June 1949 and, in so doing, is obliged to ensure that its national labour laws and practices comply with the terms of the Convention.

“Right to strike” dispute

In recent years, the national employer organisations and national trade unions participating in the ILO have disagreed about whether the “right to strike” and its modalities form part of Convention 87’s freedom of association obligations. If they do, then they form part of the UK’s freedom of association obligations flowing from its ratification of Convention 87. Herein lies a problem because the UK’s current strike laws do not conform to these

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll