header-logo header-logo

20 November 2014 / Chris Syder
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Crossing the line

Could UK strike laws be in breach of international obligations, asks Chris Syder

Membership of the International Labour Organisation (ILO), a Geneva-based United Nations body that promotes social justice, obliges the UK to respect freedom of association. Respect for freedom of association is also a legal obligation for those governments that ratify ILO labour standards incorporating freedom of association. The best known ILO labour standard concerning freedom of association is Convention 87. The UK ratified Convention 87 in June 1949 and, in so doing, is obliged to ensure that its national labour laws and practices comply with the terms of the Convention.

“Right to strike” dispute

In recent years, the national employer organisations and national trade unions participating in the ILO have disagreed about whether the “right to strike” and its modalities form part of Convention 87’s freedom of association obligations. If they do, then they form part of the UK’s freedom of association obligations flowing from its ratification of Convention 87. Herein lies a problem because the UK’s current strike laws do not conform to these

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll