header-logo header-logo

Crossing the line

20 November 2014 / Chris Syder
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Could UK strike laws be in breach of international obligations, asks Chris Syder

Membership of the International Labour Organisation (ILO), a Geneva-based United Nations body that promotes social justice, obliges the UK to respect freedom of association. Respect for freedom of association is also a legal obligation for those governments that ratify ILO labour standards incorporating freedom of association. The best known ILO labour standard concerning freedom of association is Convention 87. The UK ratified Convention 87 in June 1949 and, in so doing, is obliged to ensure that its national labour laws and practices comply with the terms of the Convention.

“Right to strike” dispute

In recent years, the national employer organisations and national trade unions participating in the ILO have disagreed about whether the “right to strike” and its modalities form part of Convention 87’s freedom of association obligations. If they do, then they form part of the UK’s freedom of association obligations flowing from its ratification of Convention 87. Herein lies a problem because the UK’s current strike laws do not conform to these

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll