header-logo header-logo

Cyber insurance a ‘sensible precaution’

12 August 2022
Issue: 7991 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber
printer mail-detail

Firms will need to consider purchasing separate cyber attack insurance this year, the Law Society has warned

The reminder follows the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s decision last year to explicitly exclude first party losses resulting from cyber attacks from professional indemnity insurance.

I Stephanie Boyce, president of the Law Society, which last week issued guidance on the issue, said: ‘It’s not a strict regulatory requirement for solicitors to purchase cyber insurance―but it’s a sensible precaution.

‘Failure to purchase such cover may conflict with solicitors’ regulatory responsibility to have “adequate and appropriate insurance”, or leave them exposed to regulatory action for data breaches.’

Boyce said cyber insurance policies ‘vary in scope and coverage’ and it was important that firms understand the options. The Law Society guidance, Cyber insurance for law firms, can be viewed here.

Issue: 7991 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll