header-logo header-logo

Damage limitation

15 February 2007 / Richard Lawson
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Richard Lawson considers the limits of recovery for damages for breach of contract

In Wiseman v Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd [2006] EWHC 1566 (QB), [2006] All ER (D) 344 (Jun) Dr Raphael Wiseman sought compensation for extra hotel accommodation and related expenses after being wrongly turned away from his flight from Nigeria to London. The High Court accepted that the action was subject to the contemplation formula laid down in Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 23 LJ Ex 179, [1843-60] All ER Rep 461. The relevant costs were allowed in Wiseman, precedent being provided by Hamlin v Great Northern Rly Co (1856) 1 H & N 408, 26 LJ Ex 20 and Woodger v Great Western Rly Co (1867) LR 2 CP 318, 36 LJCP 177.

Alternative transport

It is not entirely clear that a claim for hiring alternative transport would be unsupported in principle. In Le Blanche v London and North Western Rly Co (1876) 1 CPD 286, 40 JP 580 a passenger found that his connection had left. He hired a special train which arrived

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll