header-logo header-logo

Damage limitation

11 August 2016 / Richard Scorer
Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The new Home Secretary needs to act quickly to ensure that the national abuse inquiry doesn’t lose its momentum or integrity, as Richard Scorer explains

The resignation of Dame Lowell Goddard as chair of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse (IICSA), the third chair to resign since the inquiry was established in 2014, has caused much anguish among abuse survivors. In her resignation announcement, Goddard suggested that the inquiry has struggled to shake off its past "legacy of failure". The Home Secretary has stated unequivocally that "the work of the inquiry will continue". Meanwhile some commentators have argued that the inquiry's remit is impossibly wide, and have questioned whether the inquiry can continue in its current format, or needs to be reformed.

Powers & terms of reference

IICSA initially started life in 2014 as a non-statutory panel inquiry, becoming a statutory inquiry in 2015. Accordingly its chair now exercises judicial powers. Its terms of reference are “to consider the extent to which state and non-state institutions have failed…to protect children from sexual abuse” and to identify

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Partner joins as lead of international tax desk

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

International arbitration partner joins disputes team in London

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Firm celebrates strong retention and new talent across practice areas

NEWS
MPs have expressed disappointment after the government confirmed it will not consider updating the parental leave system until at least 2027
In his latest 'Civil way' column for this week's NLJ, Stephen Gold delivers a witty roundup of procedural updates and judicial oddities. From the rise in litigant-in-person hourly rates (£24 from October) to the Supreme Court’s venue hire options (canapés in Courtroom 1, anyone?), Gold blends legal insight with dry humour
In July, the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that trial judges had wrongly directed juries to treat profit-motivated Libor submissions as inherently dishonest. In this week’s NLJ, David Stern and James Fletcher of 5 St Andrew’s Hill reflect on the decision
Lord Neuberger, former president of the Supreme Court, shares his views on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in this week's NLJ with William Raven
Writing in NLJ this week, Nick Brett and Vicky Lankester of Brett Wilson dissect the chronic failures of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in meeting disclosure obligations. From the Post Office scandal to the collapsed trial of Liam Allan, they highlight how systemic neglect has led to wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice
back-to-top-scroll