header-logo header-logo

11 August 2016 / Richard Scorer
Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Damage limitation

The new Home Secretary needs to act quickly to ensure that the national abuse inquiry doesn’t lose its momentum or integrity, as Richard Scorer explains

The resignation of Dame Lowell Goddard as chair of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse (IICSA), the third chair to resign since the inquiry was established in 2014, has caused much anguish among abuse survivors. In her resignation announcement, Goddard suggested that the inquiry has struggled to shake off its past "legacy of failure". The Home Secretary has stated unequivocally that "the work of the inquiry will continue". Meanwhile some commentators have argued that the inquiry's remit is impossibly wide, and have questioned whether the inquiry can continue in its current format, or needs to be reformed.

Powers & terms of reference

IICSA initially started life in 2014 as a non-statutory panel inquiry, becoming a statutory inquiry in 2015. Accordingly its chair now exercises judicial powers. Its terms of reference are “to consider the extent to which state and non-state institutions have failed…to protect children from sexual abuse” and to identify

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll