header-logo header-logo

15 August 2014
Issue: 7619 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Damages

JXL and another v Britton [2014] EWHC 2571 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 22 (Aug)

In assessing a claim for damages following rape of the claimants as children, the court ruled that the crime of rape of a child involved the infliction of physical pain as well as the traumatising of the child. It would often have serious, lifelong after effects. It was difficult and unrealistic to draw a firm line between the immediate effects of the rape and the psychological consequences. The real adverse impact of a traumatic crime would often be seen most clearly in the impact it had had on the mental state of the victim. The most significant factor in determining the final size of the award was usually therefore the psychiatric or psychological evidence, and the evidence of the victim about the consequences of the offending for her. There was no difference between male and female victims of sexual crime in the principle as far as quantifying damages was concerned. Some of the decided cases concerned long campaigns of abuse directed by a defendant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll