header-logo header-logo

Data breaches: a personalised response

16 October 2019 / Elizabeth Bardsley
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance , Data protection , Technology
printer mail-detail
Elizabeth Bardsley explains why tailoring response to identity can help data controllers avoid breach claims
  • When a data breach occurs, controllers need to act fast but also consider the identity of the individuals concerned.
  • Appropriate responses may vary. Consider factors such as potential resentment against the controller, employment status and age.

Following a personal data breach, what can data controllers do to limit their exposure to data breach claims? And to what extent should breach response be shaped by the identities of the data subjects themselves?

The rise in data breach claims has been well reported. This is largely a direct result of the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) giving data subjects a statutory right to claim compensation for non-material damage in addition to material (financial). Claimants can therefore seek awards for inconvenience or distress caused by the loss or unauthorised disclosure of their data; a much lower threshold than earlier data protection law.

This, along with the onerous notification obligations the GDPR places upon data controllers,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll