header-logo header-logo

Deaf require justice

05 September 2012
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Young deaf and hard-of-hearing are poorly servced by legal services

Young deaf and hard-of-hearing people are poorly served by legal services, a report by the Royal Association for Deaf People’s Deaf Law Centre (RAD DLC) has found.

According to the report, Making the law work for young deaf people: “It is clear that there is a distinct lack of information and access in place for deaf people. This has fundamentally led to young deaf people in particular being unable to benefit from legal advice services.”

The report, which was commissioned by the Law Centres Federation, states that young deaf people “often don’t understand the options open to them” and “may also lack an understanding of the context of a legal problem, so the advice they are given may not make sense to them”. It argues that training needs to be given to legal advisers so they don’t assume knowledge the client doesn’t possess.
RAD DLC, which launched in 2012, aims to provide training to young deaf people and legal professionals.

It is intendad that law-awareness training “will go some way to address the gap in knowledge that young deaf people have, which renders it difficult for them to gain the most benefit from their sessions with solicitors and other legal advisers” the report concludes.

Issue: 7528 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll