header-logo header-logo

05 September 2012
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Deaf require justice

Young deaf and hard-of-hearing are poorly servced by legal services

Young deaf and hard-of-hearing people are poorly served by legal services, a report by the Royal Association for Deaf People’s Deaf Law Centre (RAD DLC) has found.

According to the report, Making the law work for young deaf people: “It is clear that there is a distinct lack of information and access in place for deaf people. This has fundamentally led to young deaf people in particular being unable to benefit from legal advice services.”

The report, which was commissioned by the Law Centres Federation, states that young deaf people “often don’t understand the options open to them” and “may also lack an understanding of the context of a legal problem, so the advice they are given may not make sense to them”. It argues that training needs to be given to legal advisers so they don’t assume knowledge the client doesn’t possess.
RAD DLC, which launched in 2012, aims to provide training to young deaf people and legal professionals.

It is intendad that law-awareness training “will go some way to address the gap in knowledge that young deaf people have, which renders it difficult for them to gain the most benefit from their sessions with solicitors and other legal advisers” the report concludes.

Issue: 7528 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll