header-logo header-logo

05 September 2012
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Deaf require justice

Young deaf and hard-of-hearing are poorly servced by legal services

Young deaf and hard-of-hearing people are poorly served by legal services, a report by the Royal Association for Deaf People’s Deaf Law Centre (RAD DLC) has found.

According to the report, Making the law work for young deaf people: “It is clear that there is a distinct lack of information and access in place for deaf people. This has fundamentally led to young deaf people in particular being unable to benefit from legal advice services.”

The report, which was commissioned by the Law Centres Federation, states that young deaf people “often don’t understand the options open to them” and “may also lack an understanding of the context of a legal problem, so the advice they are given may not make sense to them”. It argues that training needs to be given to legal advisers so they don’t assume knowledge the client doesn’t possess.
RAD DLC, which launched in 2012, aims to provide training to young deaf people and legal professionals.

It is intendad that law-awareness training “will go some way to address the gap in knowledge that young deaf people have, which renders it difficult for them to gain the most benefit from their sessions with solicitors and other legal advisers” the report concludes.

Issue: 7528 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll