header-logo header-logo

10 January 2008
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Dear Auntie

Pick of the week

 

 

 

Q. I do not regard myself as possessed of a weak bladder but 90 minutes into a not guilty plea, I find my concentration straying from the evidence to the nether re­gion. What do you recommend? Jason Pischer,

 

A. Bang your knees together when not examining a witness or addressing the court. If the presence of a neighbouring advo­cate makes this impractical, you should cast aside embarrassment and simply ask for a break or wink at the bench and ask for, more ambigu­ously, a wee break. Alternatively, seek a five minute adjournment on the ground that you must investigate a small point that has unex­pectedly cropped up.

Do not rush out of court as if you have a train to catch and ensure the state of your trousers on return does not give the game away, especially during the warmer weather when light-coloured and non-absorbent materials are fashionable.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll