header-logo header-logo

Death and taxes

15 May 2008 / Julian Washington
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Opinion , Tax , Wills & Probate , Other practice areas
printer mail-detail

The Burden sisters could not have won their case without unravelling some of the fundamentals of the tax system, says Julian Washington

Sybil and Joyce Burden are aged 82 and 90 respectively. They are sisters, both unmarried, and live together in a family home near Marlborough, Wiltshire, which was built on a piece of land inherited from their parents. Every year since 1976 they have written to the chancellor of the exchequer before each budget about a tax problem and asked for the rules to be changed.

The essence of their problem is that, unlike in the case of spouses, where there is generally complete exemption from inheritance tax on the first death, no such exemption will be available when Joyce or Sybil dies. In all likelihood this will cause the survivor to have to sell the house in order to fund the tax bill. As for many people, the greatest part of their wealth is in bricks and mortar; they do not have enough liquid assets to pay the tax when the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll