header-logo header-logo

Decade of cuts led to justice crisis

30 March 2021
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
Peers have added their voice to the growing chorus lamenting the crisis in the criminal justice system

In a report, COVID-19 and the courts, into the impact on civil and criminal justice, published this week, the House of Lords Constitution Committee found courts and tribunals were ‘in a vulnerable position going into this period of crisis’ due to reduced funding, budget cuts and closure of court buildings in the preceding decade. These ‘pre-existing challenges exacerbated the devastating impact of the pandemic’, the committee found.

The committee called on the government to continue to invest in technology for remote hearings but to ensure access to justice and not to regard changes made in response to the pandemic as irreversible.

It recommended the government further increase the legal aid budget to meet challenges that arose during the pandemic, and to set out a plan to address the backlog in criminal, family and employment cases to reduce it ‘well below pre-pandemic levels’. It said this should include ‘plans to make maximum use of existing real estate, open more Nightingale courtrooms, increase the number of sitting days and increase the number of part-time and retired judges sitting. All of this will require additional investment by the government’.

Baroness Taylor, chair of the committee, said: ‘For justice to be done, and be seen to be done, considerable new effort and investment is required.’

Criminal court statistics for October to December 2020, published last week, revealed 56,827 outstanding cases at the Crown Court, a 49% increase on the previous year. Bar Council Chair Derek Sweeting QC said it was the largest backlog of cases for six years and warned the impact would be felt most by the victims, witnesses, defendants and other members of public who would have to wait years for justice.

Richard Miller, head of justice at the Law Society, said there is ‘an urgent need to maximise existing court capacity and judicial sitting days’. On technology, he said it might ‘make sense to continue remotely long-term, but a thorough investigation into the effect of remote justice on court users and justice outcomes is required before its widespread adoption’.

Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll