header-logo header-logo

20 May 2020 / John Gould
Issue: 7887 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Decisions, decisions

John Gould holds the government to account on its (COVID-19) decision making

The virus has made us all decision takers; seldom can a decision to buy a bag of flour have involved the calculation of the risk of death.

The concern of public law is not so much what the decision is, but rather how it is made. When the stakes are high, as they are now, the scientific considerations esoteric, and the evidence uncertain, we need it to be obvious that the way government decisions are taken is at least of the minimum standard required by law. Lawful public decision making should be more like skilful chess than snakes and ladders.

A very senior judge once said to me that judging is a serious business, and so it is. In our present circumstances we need good judgement from our decision makers more than ever. Over the last decades the courts have established, through judicial review, the characteristics of a sound decision. The paradigm is of a rational and reasonable person

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll