header-logo header-logo

05 March 2014 / Clifford Darton
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

In deep water

web_darton

Clifford Darton provides a guide to the rising tide of flooding claims

When the recent floodwaters finally recede, landowners, water (sewerage) companies and land drainage authorities (such as the Environment Agency) could all soon find themselves the subject of claims by those who own or insure flood damaged properties. Unfortunately for these claimants, the task facing them is far more difficult than they often suppose.

There is no such thing as strict liability when it comes to surface water flooding and there are various statutory and common law impediments to establishing liability against each of these three potential defendants. If the rule in Rylands v Fletcher [1861-73] All ER Rep 1 is not now dead for all purposes then it certainly has no application to this area of law.

Landowners & riparian owners

Landowners are under no general obligation to prevent the natural flow of water onto lower land for the reasons recently restated in Arscott v Coal Authority [2003] EWHC 1690 (QB). Likewise, riparian owners (landowners whose properties abut or include a watercourse)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll