header-logo header-logo

05 March 2014 / Clifford Darton
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

In deep water

web_darton

Clifford Darton provides a guide to the rising tide of flooding claims

When the recent floodwaters finally recede, landowners, water (sewerage) companies and land drainage authorities (such as the Environment Agency) could all soon find themselves the subject of claims by those who own or insure flood damaged properties. Unfortunately for these claimants, the task facing them is far more difficult than they often suppose.

There is no such thing as strict liability when it comes to surface water flooding and there are various statutory and common law impediments to establishing liability against each of these three potential defendants. If the rule in Rylands v Fletcher [1861-73] All ER Rep 1 is not now dead for all purposes then it certainly has no application to this area of law.

Landowners & riparian owners

Landowners are under no general obligation to prevent the natural flow of water onto lower land for the reasons recently restated in Arscott v Coal Authority [2003] EWHC 1690 (QB). Likewise, riparian owners (landowners whose properties abut or include a watercourse)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll