header-logo header-logo

05 March 2014 / Clifford Darton
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

In deep water

web_darton

Clifford Darton provides a guide to the rising tide of flooding claims

When the recent floodwaters finally recede, landowners, water (sewerage) companies and land drainage authorities (such as the Environment Agency) could all soon find themselves the subject of claims by those who own or insure flood damaged properties. Unfortunately for these claimants, the task facing them is far more difficult than they often suppose.

There is no such thing as strict liability when it comes to surface water flooding and there are various statutory and common law impediments to establishing liability against each of these three potential defendants. If the rule in Rylands v Fletcher [1861-73] All ER Rep 1 is not now dead for all purposes then it certainly has no application to this area of law.

Landowners & riparian owners

Landowners are under no general obligation to prevent the natural flow of water onto lower land for the reasons recently restated in Arscott v Coal Authority [2003] EWHC 1690 (QB). Likewise, riparian owners (landowners whose properties abut or include a watercourse)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll