header-logo header-logo

14 June 2012
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Defamation—Privilege—Qualified privilege

Thour v Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust [2012] EWHC 1473 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 21 (Jun)

 

Queen’s Bench Division, Tugendhat JM, 29 May 2012

A defence of qualified privilege was made out in respect of a claim for libel based on a reference given by a former employer, an NHS trust, to the claimant’s prospective employer, another NHS trust. 

The claimant appeared in person. Sarah Palin (instructed by Radcliffes Le Brasseur) for the defendant.
 
In September 2009, the claimant applied to an NHS trust for a job. Following an interview, he received a conditional offer for the position, subject to satisfactory references. The defendant NHS trust, for whom he had previously worked, supplied a reference by his former supervisor, NB, which stated that it would not reengage him. NB stated that during the claimant’s time with the defendant he was “under investigation following allegations of aggressive behaviour. He resigned during the investigation process and therefore no formal action was taken. As this involved several different members of my staff
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll