header-logo header-logo

14 February 2014 / Morwenna Macro
Categories: Opinion , Legal services
printer mail-detail

The default dichotomy

Morwenna Macro discusses post-Mitchell developments & the two-tier test that the courts may adopt in practice

The Court of Appeal in Mitchell v News Group Newspapers [2013] EWCA Civ 1537 [2013] All ER (D) 314 (Nov) did not intend to change the relationship between justice and procedure “by turning the rules and rule compliance into the mistress rather than the handmaid of justice”; but is this the result of their ruling?

While it seems that generally the judiciary is feeling constrained to narrowly follow the robust approach of Mitchell; there is still some leeway for judges to use their discretion and, with some ingenuity, the traditional notions of justice and prejudice may still prevail.

Mitchell in effect has created a two-tier test; trivial defaults are usually forgiven; non-trivial defaults normally need a good reason for relief to be granted. 

Measuring up

So what is a trivial default? It is a minor slip that causes little or no prejudice, such as a narrowly-missed deadline or a failure of form rather than substance. Therefore:

  • Serving
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll