header-logo header-logo

Deferred bonuses fail in popularity stakes

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Financial services industry could be considered too volatile for deferred bonus scheme

Financial institutions which try to defer bonus payments in future could face fierce resistance from employees after the collapse of Lehman Brothers, lawyers say.

Richie Alder, partner at Trowers & Hamlins, says employees may see Lehman’s downfall as evidence that their industry is too volatile for bonus payments to be deferred too far into the future.

He says: “Banks and hedge funds are likely to come up against a great deal of resistance from their employees next time bonus payments are deferred.

“Critics have placed the blame for the City and Wall Street’s current woes firmly at the door of the bonus culture they say has encouraged excessive risk taking and the financial services sector is now under pressure to defer bonus payments for longer and longer periods.”

This, he says, encourages traders to consider the longterm effects of their deals and prevents them from moving on before high-risk deals begin to unravel.

However much banks might like to defer bonus payments to improve their cash flows, he says, those vying to recruit Lehman’s best talent may find that employees who have seen their bonuses disappear overnight will be reluctant to agree these terms. “Other financial services professionals moving into new roles are also likely to be pushing to secure a bonus structure that protects them from the same fate Lehman employees are now facing. They will want to agree a deal that sees any guaranteed bonus schemes paid out as early as possible, or at least at regular intervals.” He adds that bonuses are often discretionary and so Lehman Brothers employees’ chances of recovering their bonuses may be very remote.
 

Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll