header-logo header-logo

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Deferred bonuses fail in popularity stakes

Financial services industry could be considered too volatile for deferred bonus scheme

Financial institutions which try to defer bonus payments in future could face fierce resistance from employees after the collapse of Lehman Brothers, lawyers say.

Richie Alder, partner at Trowers & Hamlins, says employees may see Lehman’s downfall as evidence that their industry is too volatile for bonus payments to be deferred too far into the future.

He says: “Banks and hedge funds are likely to come up against a great deal of resistance from their employees next time bonus payments are deferred.

“Critics have placed the blame for the City and Wall Street’s current woes firmly at the door of the bonus culture they say has encouraged excessive risk taking and the financial services sector is now under pressure to defer bonus payments for longer and longer periods.”

This, he says, encourages traders to consider the longterm effects of their deals and prevents them from moving on before high-risk deals begin to unravel.

However much banks might like to defer bonus payments to improve their cash flows, he says, those vying to recruit Lehman’s best talent may find that employees who have seen their bonuses disappear overnight will be reluctant to agree these terms. “Other financial services professionals moving into new roles are also likely to be pushing to secure a bonus structure that protects them from the same fate Lehman employees are now facing. They will want to agree a deal that sees any guaranteed bonus schemes paid out as early as possible, or at least at regular intervals.” He adds that bonuses are often discretionary and so Lehman Brothers employees’ chances of recovering their bonuses may be very remote.
 

Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll