header-logo header-logo

06 August 2009 / Marianne Rivett , Laura West
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Deposit dilemmas

Laura West & Marianne Rivett explain why the tenancy deposit scheme is coming unstuck

The requirements of the compulsory tenancy deposit scheme are set out in Pt VI, Chapter 4 of the Housing Act 2004 [HA 2004].

Within 14 days of receiving a deposit a landlord must, pursuant to s 213(3), comply with the initial requirements of one of the authorised schemes (two being custodial, one insurance backed).

Neither “landlord” nor “tenant” is defined for the purposes of the scheme. Additionally, pursuant to s 213(5), a landlord who has received a deposit must give to the tenant and any other “relevant person” (defined in s 213(10) as any person who has paid the deposit on behalf of the tenant) certain prescribed information as set out in s 213(5) HA 2004 and the Housing (Tenancy Deposits) Prescribed Information) Order 2007 (SI 2007/797).
 

Applications to the county court

Where a deposit has been paid any tenant or relevant person may apply to the county court either because the landlord has:

(i) failed to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll