header-logo header-logo

Desperate measures?

16 March 2012 / David Cowan
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Could sale & rentback fix the mortgage arrears hole? David Cowan investigates

Sale and rentback transactions seem on their face to be a pretty good way of solving a homeowner’s debt crisis. They get to stay in their own home and may get a capital payment. The buyer gets a capital asset and entitlement to rent (if one is to be charged). It is unclear how many such transactions have taken place but, in 2008, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) estimated that around 53,000 such transactions had taken place (Sale and Rent Back – An OFT Market Study, OFT 1018, London: OFT).

Transactional risk

Nevertheless, there are considerable risks to the former homeowner (the seller-renter) which arise in these transactions. It is crystal clear that these transactions are not for the faint-hearted or, indeed, for many households in debt. The Financial Services Authority (FSA), which now regulates these transactions, requires firms to provide the following information to potential victims:

“Consider these schemes only as a last resort. Make sure you have looked

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll