header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Desperate measures?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
16 March 2012 / David Cowan
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Could sale & rentback fix the mortgage arrears hole? David Cowan investigates

Sale and rentback transactions seem on their face to be a pretty good way of solving a homeowner’s debt crisis. They get to stay in their own home and may get a capital payment. The buyer gets a capital asset and entitlement to rent (if one is to be charged). It is unclear how many such transactions have taken place but, in 2008, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) estimated that around 53,000 such transactions had taken place (Sale and Rent Back – An OFT Market Study, OFT 1018, London: OFT).

Transactional risk

Nevertheless, there are considerable risks to the former homeowner (the seller-renter) which arise in these transactions. It is crystal clear that these transactions are not for the faint-hearted or, indeed, for many households in debt. The Financial Services Authority (FSA), which now regulates these transactions, requires firms to provide the following information to potential victims:

“Consider these schemes only as a last resort. Make sure you have looked

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll