16 March 2012 / David Cowan

Issue: 7505 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property

printer

mail-detail

Desperate measures?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Could sale & rentback fix the mortgage arrears hole? David Cowan investigates

Sale and rentback transactions seem on their face to be a pretty good way of solving a homeowner’s debt crisis. They get to stay in their own home and may get a capital payment. The buyer gets a capital asset and entitlement to rent (if one is to be charged). It is unclear how many such transactions have taken place but, in 2008, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) estimated that around 53,000 such transactions had taken place (Sale and Rent Back – An OFT Market Study, OFT 1018, London: OFT).

Transactional risk

Nevertheless, there are considerable risks to the former homeowner (the seller-renter) which arise in these transactions. It is crystal clear that these transactions are not for the faint-hearted or, indeed, for many households in debt. The Financial Services Authority (FSA), which now regulates these transactions, requires firms to provide the following information to potential victims:

“Consider these schemes only as a last resort. Make sure you have looked

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Desperate measures?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Could sale & rentback fix the mortgage arrears hole? David Cowan investigates

Sale and rentback transactions seem on their face to be a pretty good way of solving a homeowner’s debt crisis. They get to stay in their own home and may get a capital payment. The buyer gets a capital asset and entitlement to rent (if one is to be charged). It is unclear how many such transactions have taken place but, in 2008, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) estimated that around 53,000 such transactions had taken place (Sale and Rent Back – An OFT Market Study, OFT 1018, London: OFT).

Transactional risk

Nevertheless, there are considerable risks to the former homeowner (the seller-renter) which arise in these transactions. It is crystal clear that these transactions are not for the faint-hearted or, indeed, for many households in debt. The Financial Services Authority (FSA), which now regulates these transactions, requires firms to provide the following information to potential victims:

“Consider these schemes only as a last resort. Make sure you have looked

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS

NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’

Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot

NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake

The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’

NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’

A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes

NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?

After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent

NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?

Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25

back-to-top-scroll