header-logo header-logo

A difference of opinion

04 October 2007 / Charmaine Murray , Lee Parkhill
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Functions of a public nature should be defined on a case by case basis. Lee Parkhill and Charmaine Murray explain

In YL v Birmingham City Council and others [2007] UKHL 27, [2007] 3 All ER 957 their lordships considered the scope of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998), s 6(3)(b), which allows for bodies other than core public authorities to be subject to the obligation, contained in s 6(1), which requires them to act compatibly with the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

An otherwise private body may be regarded as a public authority for the purposes of HRA 1998 if, per s 6(3)(b), it performs “functions of a public nature”. Such a body is commonly referred to as a hybrid public authority. The obligation on such hybrid bodies to observe Convention rights attaches only to functions which are of a public nature. Therefore, determining the scope of s 6(3)(b) is necessary not only to identify which bodies are subject to the obligation in s 6(1), but also to determine

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll