header-logo header-logo

Difficult facts making bad law

10 May 2013 / Paul Letman
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail
istock_000012676713large

Paul Letman analyses a recent landmark decision on residential service charges

The High Court’s decision in Phillips v Francis [2012] EWHC 3650 (Ch) changes the established approach to consultation under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985) in respect of qualifying works, defined as works on a building or any other premises to the costs of which a tenant may be required to contribute by payment of a service charge (see s 20(2)).

The change

Before this decision, the received approach to the question of whether to consult or not under LTA 1985—before amendment by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002) —followed the Court of Appeal decision in Martin v Maryland [1999] 2 EGLR 53. In that case, Robert Walker LJ laid down what he described as “a common sense” approach to deciding how, if at all, to divide up works for the purpose of deciding whether a landlord should have complied with the statutory consultation requirements in respect of those works.

Essentially, the old approach

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll