header-logo header-logo

10 May 2013 / Paul Letman
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Difficult facts making bad law

istock_000012676713large

Paul Letman analyses a recent landmark decision on residential service charges

The High Court’s decision in Phillips v Francis [2012] EWHC 3650 (Ch) changes the established approach to consultation under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985) in respect of qualifying works, defined as works on a building or any other premises to the costs of which a tenant may be required to contribute by payment of a service charge (see s 20(2)).

The change

Before this decision, the received approach to the question of whether to consult or not under LTA 1985—before amendment by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002) —followed the Court of Appeal decision in Martin v Maryland [1999] 2 EGLR 53. In that case, Robert Walker LJ laid down what he described as “a common sense” approach to deciding how, if at all, to divide up works for the purpose of deciding whether a landlord should have complied with the statutory consultation requirements in respect of those works.

Essentially, the old approach

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll