header-logo header-logo

Difficult facts making bad law

10 May 2013 / Paul Letman
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail
istock_000012676713large

Paul Letman analyses a recent landmark decision on residential service charges

The High Court’s decision in Phillips v Francis [2012] EWHC 3650 (Ch) changes the established approach to consultation under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985) in respect of qualifying works, defined as works on a building or any other premises to the costs of which a tenant may be required to contribute by payment of a service charge (see s 20(2)).

The change

Before this decision, the received approach to the question of whether to consult or not under LTA 1985—before amendment by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002) —followed the Court of Appeal decision in Martin v Maryland [1999] 2 EGLR 53. In that case, Robert Walker LJ laid down what he described as “a common sense” approach to deciding how, if at all, to divide up works for the purpose of deciding whether a landlord should have complied with the statutory consultation requirements in respect of those works.

Essentially, the old approach

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll