header-logo header-logo

Difficult facts making bad law

10 May 2013 / Paul Letman
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail
istock_000012676713large

Paul Letman analyses a recent landmark decision on residential service charges

The High Court’s decision in Phillips v Francis [2012] EWHC 3650 (Ch) changes the established approach to consultation under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985) in respect of qualifying works, defined as works on a building or any other premises to the costs of which a tenant may be required to contribute by payment of a service charge (see s 20(2)).

The change

Before this decision, the received approach to the question of whether to consult or not under LTA 1985—before amendment by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002) —followed the Court of Appeal decision in Martin v Maryland [1999] 2 EGLR 53. In that case, Robert Walker LJ laid down what he described as “a common sense” approach to deciding how, if at all, to divide up works for the purpose of deciding whether a landlord should have complied with the statutory consultation requirements in respect of those works.

Essentially, the old approach

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll