header-logo header-logo

Digging the dirt: unexplained wealth orders

03 March 2017 / Jonathan Fisher KC
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7736_carousel_fisher

Jonathan Fisher QC explores unexplained wealth orders

  • Several questions concerning the introduction of the unexplained wealth order remain unanswered

The proposed introduction of a free-standing procedure into the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) which compels an individual to explain the source of his wealth is a radical development in English law. More usually, judges are required to decide upon matters relating to disclosure of information where the issue arises during civil proceedings, or where a defendant seeks to explain the legitimate origin of his assets in confiscation proceedings following criminal conviction.

Under the new provision, which is the first to be introduced by the Criminal Finances Bill 2016 and is to be known as an unexplained wealth order (UWO), there is no need for any civil or criminal proceedings to have been initiated. An enforcement authority may apply to the High Court in circumstances where an individual is a foreign politically-exposed person (PEP), or there are reasonable grounds to suspect that an individual has been involved in serious

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll