header-logo header-logo

03 March 2017 / Jonathan Fisher KC
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Digging the dirt: unexplained wealth orders

nlj_7736_carousel_fisher

Jonathan Fisher QC explores unexplained wealth orders

  • Several questions concerning the introduction of the unexplained wealth order remain unanswered

The proposed introduction of a free-standing procedure into the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) which compels an individual to explain the source of his wealth is a radical development in English law. More usually, judges are required to decide upon matters relating to disclosure of information where the issue arises during civil proceedings, or where a defendant seeks to explain the legitimate origin of his assets in confiscation proceedings following criminal conviction.

Under the new provision, which is the first to be introduced by the Criminal Finances Bill 2016 and is to be known as an unexplained wealth order (UWO), there is no need for any civil or criminal proceedings to have been initiated. An enforcement authority may apply to the High Court in circumstances where an individual is a foreign politically-exposed person (PEP), or there are reasonable grounds to suspect that an individual has been involved in serious

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll