header-logo header-logo

Digging the dirt: unexplained wealth orders

03 March 2017 / Jonathan Fisher KC
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7736_carousel_fisher

Jonathan Fisher QC explores unexplained wealth orders

  • Several questions concerning the introduction of the unexplained wealth order remain unanswered

The proposed introduction of a free-standing procedure into the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) which compels an individual to explain the source of his wealth is a radical development in English law. More usually, judges are required to decide upon matters relating to disclosure of information where the issue arises during civil proceedings, or where a defendant seeks to explain the legitimate origin of his assets in confiscation proceedings following criminal conviction.

Under the new provision, which is the first to be introduced by the Criminal Finances Bill 2016 and is to be known as an unexplained wealth order (UWO), there is no need for any civil or criminal proceedings to have been initiated. An enforcement authority may apply to the High Court in circumstances where an individual is a foreign politically-exposed person (PEP), or there are reasonable grounds to suspect that an individual has been involved in serious

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll