header-logo header-logo

27 October 2011
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The digital age

Lord Neuberger speaks out on technology in the courtroom

The judicial iPad may replace the judicial notebook and evidence in court may become more electronically-based but virtual courts are “likely to be a step too far”, Lord Neuberger has said.

While such a system has its advantages and while evidence by tele-conferencing is already in use, “witnesses giving their evidence in a traditional court by video is miles away from a fully electronic hearing with no court room,” he said, delivering the High Sheriff’s Lecture in Leeds last week.

A trial is “the state in action” and it may be hard to maintain the seriousness of litigation “unless court hearings take place in a physical space open to the public, in which the parties, the witnesses and the judge are present”.

Issue: 7487 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll