header-logo header-logo

Digital justice must be accessible

03 October 2019
Categories: Legal News , Technology , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
A 29-point plan to tackle digital exclusion and ensure the government’s £1bn court reform programme delivers access to justice for all court users has been published by legal charity, The Legal Education Foundation (TLEF).

The report, ‘Digital Justice: HMCTS data strategy and delivering access to justice’, was drawn up by TLEF research director Dr Natalie Byrom, following a three-month secondment at HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS), during which she interviewed senior judges, government staff, academic researchers, and data and privacy specialists.

Byrom said: ‘The move to online courts is an incredible opportunity to create a justice system that works well for everyone, whether they are an individual in crisis who has never been to court before, or a large organisation which regularly brings claims.

‘We need to ensure that digital processes are designed and monitored in line with recognised access to justice principles. We also need to be able to measure how different groups fare under the online processes, compared with paper-based, or face-to-face systems.’

Under the court reform programme, entire areas of law such as divorce, civil money claims, certain types of social security and child support tribunal cases will be dealt with online, with physical hearings reserved only for cases that cannot otherwise be resolved.

One key TLEF recommendation is that the government monitor access to justice by collecting data about court users through optional questions about characteristics such as age, gender, whether English is spoken as a first language, whether they are represented by a lawyer and mental or physical disability. This data capture must be subject to strict, clear and ethical controls in order to protect people’s privacy. TLEF further recommends that HMCTS dedicate resources to reviewing national and international best practice, existing legal frameworks and testing the acceptability of different models with stakeholders and the public.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Richard Meers

Arc Pensions Law—Richard Meers

Pensions litigation team announces senior associate hire

Burges Salmon—Neil Demuth

Burges Salmon—Neil Demuth

Firm appoints new chief financial officer

Anthony Collins—Sue Bearman

Anthony Collins—Sue Bearman

Social purpose firm announces director hire plus eight promotions

NEWS
Human rights lawyers, social justice champion, co-founder of the law firm Bindmans, and NLJ columnist Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC has died at the age of 92 years
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
back-to-top-scroll